This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 11:51] – created yair | tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:25] (current) – [criticism] yair | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
AVB (Audio Video Bridging) is a protocol that address the lack of a unified, open protocol for video and audio distribution over standard ethernet network. | AVB (Audio Video Bridging) is a protocol that address the lack of a unified, open protocol for video and audio distribution over standard ethernet network. | ||
- | |||
- | - [[https:// | ||
- | - [[https:// | ||
< | < | ||
Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | [[https://support.biamp.com/Tesira/AVB/List_of_AVB-capable_Ethernet_switches|List_of_AVB-capable_Ethernet_switches]] {{tamiwiki: | + | ===== criticism ===== |
+ | good reddit thread with some notable quotes | ||
+ | |||
+ | latency varies. | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | When it works, the AVB virtual device adds about ~15ms of latency. (not unlike DVS)\\ | ||
+ | AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why does [[https://rme-audio.de/ | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | and special switches are a bitch | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | AVB requires specialised chipsets in switches; which makes it a nightmare. Dante and Ravenna work on most reasonable off the shelf managed switch chipsets | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
- | PRODUCTS | + | ===== products ===== |
+ | - 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor, **MAC only** [[https:// | ||
+ | - 400$ MOTU AVB Switch [[https:// | ||
+ | - [[https:// | ||
- | - 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor [B[https:// |