This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:10] – yair | tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:25] (current) – [criticism] yair | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | ===== criticism ===== | ||
+ | good reddit thread with some notable quotes | ||
- | [[https:// | + | latency varies. |
- | + | ||
- | ====== criticism====== | + | |
< | < | ||
AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | ||
Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | ||
- | Why does RME use USB? Because they know what they’re doing.\\ | + | Why does [[https:// |
- | < | + | < |
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | and special switches are a bitch | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | AVB requires specialised chipsets in switches; which makes it a nightmare. Dante and Ravenna work on most reasonable off the shelf managed switch chipsets - so the economies of scale and simplicity of installation / integration does not lie with AVB. | ||
+ | < | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ====== PRODUCTS ====== | ||
+ | ===== products ===== | ||
- 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor, **MAC only** [[https:// | - 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor, **MAC only** [[https:// | ||
- 400$ MOTU AVB Switch [[https:// | - 400$ MOTU AVB Switch [[https:// | ||
+ | - [[https:// | ||
+ |